News

Jun. 26, 2018: US-China Tariff Resources

 Posted by on June 26, 2018  News  Comments Off on Jun. 26, 2018: US-China Tariff Resources
Jun 262018
 

With the continuous back-and-forth between US and China on trade, we’ve compiled a list of resources which outline tariffs and how they impact your business and bottom-line.

Chinese Tariffs on U.S. products
U.S. Tariffs on Chinese Products (effective July 6th)
U.S. Tariffs on Chinese Products (date TBD)
Economic Impact of Tariffs Tracker

On June 20th, Indiana Governor Eric Holcomb met with Vice President Mike Pence to discuss among other things, his concern for trade tariffs on Indiana businesses. Read full statement

 

Jun. 1, 2018: ACSI Announces Strategic Partnership with The International Center

 Posted by on June 1, 2018  News  Comments Off on Jun. 1, 2018: ACSI Announces Strategic Partnership with The International Center
Jun 012018
 

ACSI is delighted to announce a new strategic partnership with The International Center, an organization dedicated to inform, convene and connect public, private and civic global objectives in Indiana. Through this agreement, both organizations will collaborate to encourage and support international business by providing China- and Indiana-based firms with intercultural communication, relocations and protocol services.

Apr. 4, 2018: Meimanaliev Joins ACSI Board

 Posted by on April 3, 2018  News  Comments Off on Apr. 4, 2018: Meimanaliev Joins ACSI Board
Apr 032018
 

ACSI is delighted to announce the addition of Mr. Adilet-Sultan Meimanaliev to its Board of Directors! Mr. Meimanaliev serves as an International Corporate Affairs Operations manager in Lilly’s Global Corporate Affairs group to provide strategy and operations support to affiliate Corporate Affairs teams outside of the United States.

Adilet-Sultan joined Lilly in 2009 as an Associate in the Global Public Policy Department where he was responsible for developing and supporting the company’s external public policy positions and providing policy analysis and advice to affiliates.

Prior to joining Lilly, Adilet-Sultan worked in Central Asia with Procter & Gamble and international development agencies, such as the USAID, World Health Organization and World Bank. He worked as a health economist on health system reforms in Kyrgyzstan, a liaison with the Asia-Pacific National Health Accounts Network, and a regional policy advisor for tuberculosis control in Kazakhstan and neighboring countries. He co-authored several publications and research reports.

Adilet-Sultan earned his bachelor’s degree summa cum laude from the American University in Kyrgyzstan in 1999, his Master’s degree cum laude in Social Policy Analysis from the Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium in 2003, and a Master’s of Public Administration in International Development from the Harvard Kennedy School of Government in 2009.

Adilet-Sultan is a founding member and former President of the Board of Indiana Ballet Conservatory, a pre-professional ballet school. He also served on the Board of A Children’s Habitat Montessori School.

 

Mar. 27, 2018: ACSI Co-Hosts Reception for Heavy Duty Truck Delegation

 Posted by on April 2, 2018  News  Comments Off on Mar. 27, 2018: ACSI Co-Hosts Reception for Heavy Duty Truck Delegation
Apr 022018
 

On Tuesday, March 27th, ACSI co-hosted a morning reception for a Heavy Duty Vehicle delegation at the Skyline Club in downtown Indianapolis. In partnership with the USTDA, Indy Chamber and US Commercial Service, the delegation listened to presentations from  Hoosier Gasket, Advanced Industrial Marketing, Stant Corporation, EMP Engineered Machined Products and PRUV Mobility Ecosystem before engaging in networking with Indiana companies.

Mar. 14, 2018: RSM Releases China Outlook 2018

 Posted by on March 14, 2018  News  Comments Off on Mar. 14, 2018: RSM Releases China Outlook 2018
Mar 142018
 

The Real Economy publication is authored by, Joe Brusuelas, Chief Economist, RSM US LLP. Questions may be directed to Jon Davis, Indianapolis Office Managing Partner, RSM US LLP.

What’s at stake in an increasingly tense U.S.-China relationship? Over the past four decades the economic and trade relationship between the U.S. and China has been dramatically transformed, growing from about $2 billion in 1979 to approximately $612.5 billion in 2017. In this issue of The Real Economy, Joe Brusuelas (Chief Economist, RSM US LLP) looks at how trade frictions and associated political noise increasingly overshadow the deep and broad economic relationship that supports growth in each country and across the global economy.

Full Report

Reprinted with permission from RSM US LLP. This document contains general information, may be based on authorities that are subject to change,  and is not a substitute for professional advice or services. This document does not constitute audit,  tax, consulting, business, financial, investment, legal or other professional advice, and you should  consult a qualified professional advisor before taking any action based on the information herein.  RSM US LLP, its affiliates and related entities are not responsible for any loss resulting from or  relating to reliance on this document by any person. Internal Revenue Service rules require us to  inform you that this communication may be deemed a solicitation to provide tax services.  This  communication is being sent to individuals who have subscribed to receive it or who we believe  would have an interest in the topics discussed. RSM US LLP is a limited liability partnership and  the U.S. member firm of RSM International, a global network of independent audit, tax and  consulting firms. The member firms of RSM International collaborate to provide services to global  clients, but are separate and distinct legal entities that cannot obligate each other. Each member firm  is responsible only for its own acts and omissions, and not those of any other party. Visit

rsmus.com/aboutus for more information regarding RSM US LLP and RSM International. RSM®  and the RSM logo are registered trademarks of RSM International Association. The power of being  understood® is a registered trademark of RSM US LLP.

© 2018 RSM US LLP. All Rights Reserved.

 

Mar. 2, 2018: ACSI Co-Hosts China Business Career Fair

 Posted by on March 6, 2018  News  Comments Off on Mar. 2, 2018: ACSI Co-Hosts China Business Career Fair
Mar 062018
 

On Friday, March 2nd, ACSI co-hosted the “Careers in China” Career Fair at the Indiana Memorial Union in Bloomington. In collaboration with Indiana University’s Career Services Council, Chinese Student Scholars Association, and Chinese Business Association, the event played host to nearly 20 companies and organizations in order to connect with American and Chinese students currently enrolled at Indiana University-Bloomington.

Jan. 23, 2018: ACSI Elects Two New Board Members

 Posted by on January 23, 2018  News  Comments Off on Jan. 23, 2018: ACSI Elects Two New Board Members
Jan 232018
 

 



The America China Society of Indiana (ACSI), a non-profit that facilitates bilateral business opportunities between Indiana and China, is delighted to announce the appointment of Dr. Craig Seidelson and Mrs. Jennifer Pearl to its Board of Directors.

Dr. Craig Seidelson assists both Chinese and foreign companies set up and improve their supply chains & operations in China. As a Chief Manufacturing Engineer for a Fortune 500 company, Dr. Seidelson worked in China for 16 years. At the University of Indianapolis, Mr. Seidelson teaches Manufacturing in China at the undergraduate & post graduate levels and his research has been published in China, Europe and the US. 

Mrs. Jennifer Pearl currently serves as Director of International Programs for the Indy Chamber. Before her time at the Chamber, Mrs. Pearl conducted public policy and strategic communications in Beijing as a senior consultant for North Head. Mrs. Pearl received both her M.A. in China/Mandarin Chinese and M.P.A. in Policy Analysis from Indiana University- Bloomington.

 

 

Jan. 17, 2018: Chinese FDI in the US in 2017 (Rhodium Group)

 Posted by on January 30, 2018  News  Comments Off on Jan. 17, 2018: Chinese FDI in the US in 2017 (Rhodium Group)
Jan 302018
 

Thilo Hanemann and Daniel H. Rosen | January 17, 2018

Headline Investment Dropped by 35%

RHG’s China Investment Monitor recorded 141 Chinese direct investment transactions in the US worth $29 billion in 2017. This represents a drop of 35% drop compared to the record year 2016 but is still the second-largest year on the record for Chinese investment in the United States.

The split between mergers and acquisitions (M&A) and greenfield projects remained similar to previous years, with M&A accounting for 98% of total investment. In terms of industries, the biggest losers were entertainment, consumer products and services and real estate and hospitality. Investment remained stable or grew in health and biotech, ICT and transport and infrastructure. While sovereign and state-owned players gained globally in 2017, private investors continued to account for about 90% of investment in the US. More details on the composition of 2017 investment are available through our China Investment Monitor.

New Deal-making Down More than 90%

The completed transactions perspective does not adequately portray the drastic fall-off in Chinese investment activity throughout the year. More than half (60%) of the 2017 transaction value stemmed from the completion of deals announced during the 2016 investment boom. Considering new activity in 2017 only, the decline was much sharper: The value of newly announced Chinese acquisitions in the US fell to $8.7 billion in 2017, a drop of more than 90% from 2016 and the lowest level in six years.

Friendly Fire: Chinese capital controls

The principal factor behind the decline in China-to-US deal flow was Beijing’s changing stance on outbound capital flows. In late 2016, Chinese regulators launched an informal crackdown on “irrational” outbound investment to contain large-scale capital outflows that were melting down China’s reserves. In August, these informal policies were codified through a new OFDI regime based on lists of six types of encouraged investments, five types of restricted investments and five types of prohibited investments. Some of the restricted sectors have been important drivers of Chinese FDI in the US in recent years, including real estate and hospitality (which accounted for 36% of total US investment in the past 3 years) and sports and entertainment (another 7% of total investment in the past 3 years).

In May 2017, Chinese regulators also began to scrutinize large private conglomerates’ outbound investment activities as part of a broader effort to clean up risks and reduce leverage in China’s financial sector. Many of these investors have been aggressive overseas dealmakers in the US in recent years, including entertainment empire Wanda and conglomerate HNA Group (which was single-handedly responsible for almost one third of total Chinese investment in the US in 2015-2016).

Globally, Beijing’s regulatory crackdown triggered the first drop in Chinese outbound FDI after more than a decade of continuous growth: China’s Ministry of Commerce recorded a drop of 29% in non-financial outbound FDI for the full year 2017, the first decline since 2006. Other official Chinese datasets recorded an even sharper decline: the State Administration of Foreign Exchange recorded a drop of 64% in the growth of Chinese FDI assets in China’s balance of payments for 1Q-3Q 2017.

In the United States, the informal crackdown triggered an immediate drop-off in Chinese deal activity (Figure 3). In addition to curbing new activity, Beijing’s crackdown also resulted in the breakup of several pending US transactions, including Wanda’s $1 billion acquisition of Dick Clark Productions or Anhui Xinke’s $345 million acquisition of a stake in Voltage Pictures.

Security Screenings Bog Down US Investment

The second factor explaining the 2017 decline in both completed and announced transactions was greater US regulatory pushback. An unprecedented number of Chinese deals were delayed or abandoned in 2017 as parties failed to obtain approval from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), which screens foreign acquisitions for potential national security risks.

Growing CFIUS deal risk was driven by two factors: first, the slow progress with government transition left many leadership positions unfilled for the better part of 2017, causing delays and a cycle of re-submissions. Second, and more importantly, CFIUS seems to have broadened its approach for reviewing Chinese deals, taking into consideration a broader array of criteria when assessing security risks, for example state-sponsored M&A activity to obtain certain technologies or concerns about data protection.

Prominent transactions that were abandoned during the year because of unresolved CFIUS concerns included Canyon Bridge Capital’s acquisition of Lattice Semiconductor, Zhongwang’s acquisition of Aleris Corp, Orient Hontai’s acquisition of a stake in Applovin and HNA’s acquisition of a stake in Global Eagle Entertainment. In early January 2018, Ant Financial abandoned its proposed acquisition of Moneygram due to CFIUS concerns. Financial regulators also stepped up scrutiny of Chinese investors in 2017, with the SEC freezing the sale of the Chicago Stock Exchange to a consortium led by China’s Chongqing Casin Enterprise Group, and state financial regulators inquiring into Anbang’s acquisition of Fidelity & Guaranty Life. If completed, these deals would have added at least another $7-8 billion to the 2017 headline figure.

In addition to busting pending transactions, growing US regulatory assertiveness and uncertainty also weighed on new Chinese deal making through the end of the year. This is particularly apparent when looking at the investment momentum in the second half of 2017: While global Chinese outbound investment activity rebounded globally and in other OECD economies (most importantly the EU and Canada), it remained depressed in the US (Figure 4).

Outlook: From Bad to Worse?

Chinese commercial appetite for US investment expansion is stronger than ever, but regulatory hurdles won’t fade in Beijing and will almost surely increase in the US.

In China, the restrictive outbound investment regime will remain in place. Worries about capital flight have subsided and Beijing is putting on a brave face about 2018 expectations. However, the table looks set for a return of the conditions that fueled capital flight during the past two years: rising US growth and interest rates, and a China unable to raise rates significantly without causing corporate insolvencies. While Beijing has loosened the leash on corporate outbound investment a bit in the second half of 2017, we expect regulators to remain in a conservative mode, trying to keep capital outflows at “healthy” levels and steering aggregate investment levels by influencing individual deals as needed.

Even if domestic and global macroeconomic conditions permit Beijing to loosen capital controls this year, changes on the US side may stymie a recovery in bilateral flows. The 2017 China-US OFDI downturn was overwhelmingly due to China’s capital controls, with tighter US screening playing just a supporting role. But 2018 will be a different story. A series of 2017 and early 2018 deal failures suggests CFIUS concerns are already swelling. The Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act, or FIRRMA, is making progress on Capitol Hill and appears likely to come to a vote this year. China epitomizes the “countries of special concern” the bill is concerned with, and in expanding the types of transactions subject to screening, a significant share of the marginal growth in foreign investment in the US would be treated with suspicion.

Beyond FDI policy and screening per se, the Trump Administration issued a new National Security Strategy in the final days of 2017 which redefined China as a strategic rival, removed a presumption of engagement and knit economic interaction into the security calculus in a profound way.  This change to a confrontational economic-security policy will almost surely sour the US-China investment climate, with negative implications for future flows. The presumption that China is actively pursuing a zero-sum campaign toward the United States – as suggested by the new Administration document – will result in more onerous treatment for many Chinese firms operating in the US, even when they are not in sectors of national security concern. President Trump’s State of the Union on January 30th and decisions on several trade cases in coming weeks will signal just how aggressive this shift will be.

The extent of strategic re-orientation will make a huge difference in future Chinese investment flows to the US. If it were just a matter of narrowly-defined national security, the US could redouble its diligence screening for risks and still enjoy a great expansion of Chinese investment: today’s levels are not high in proportion to the size of our two economies. National security and ample deal flow are not an either-or.  But a draconian effort to push back on China’s economic footprint in America that transcends discreet national security concerns will forfeit these opportunities.

SOURCE: http://rhg.com/notes/chinese-fdi-in-the-us-in-2017-a-double-policy-punch

Jan. 11, 2018: World Trade Center-Indy Signs MOU with WTC-Harbin

 Posted by on January 23, 2018  News  Comments Off on Jan. 11, 2018: World Trade Center-Indy Signs MOU with WTC-Harbin
Jan 232018
 

On January 11th, World Trade Center-Indianapolis signed a Memorandum of Understanding agreement with World Trade Center-Harbin (China). The agreement, witnessed by Lt. Gov Suzanne Crouch, seeks to develop commercial exchanges with regular meetings to cultivate opportunities in agriculture, ag-tech and water resource management.